World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 55 4385 4262 2045 1973 282 9756

Lawrence Hunter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lawrence Hunter between 1952 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lawrence Hunter published across 75 years, from 1952 to 2026, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2020. 8 of the 403 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1952 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2020. 1952: 1 publication 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 31 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
1952 2026

403 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lawrence Hunter: publications per year, 1952 to 2026
Year Publications
1952 1
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 3
1987 0
1988 3
1989 2
1990 1
1991 3
1992 7
1993 10
1994 0
1995 5
1996 5
1997 5
1998 4
1999 10
2000 1
2001 2
2002 8
2003 6
2004 9
2005 8
2006 11
2007 13
2008 22
2009 28
2010 19
2011 18
2012 13
2013 12
2014 8
2015 6
2016 9
2017 15
2018 9
2019 25
2020 31
2021 10
2022 24
2023 15
2024 12
2025 7
2026 1
Total 403
Download as CSV

Lawrence Hunter publications per year - data summary

  • Lawrence Hunter, a Computer Science scholar from University of Colorado Denver, has 403 publications recorded across 75 years, from 1952 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1952 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 31 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1952, 1975, 1983, 1990 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 33 of the 75 years in the span carry no publications at all (1953, 1954, 1955, 1956 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.6 per year counting only the 42 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 59 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1952-1976: 2 publications (0.1 per year); 1977-2001: 62 publications (2.5 per year); 2002-2026: 339 publications (13.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Lawrence Hunter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence Hunter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 282–291 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 282 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320 282
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Lawrence Hunter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Lawrence Hunter, a Computer Science scholar from University of Colorado Denver, records 282 publications - the 70th percentile of the discipline.
  • 70% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Lawrence Hunter, and about 30% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Lawrence Hunter ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Lawrence Hunter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence Hunter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500 55
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Lawrence Hunter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Lawrence Hunter, a Computer Science scholar from University of Colorado Denver, records 55 D-Index - the 71st percentile of the discipline.
  • 71% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Lawrence Hunter, and about 29% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Lawrence Hunter ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Lawrence Hunter is affiliated with the University of Colorado Denver in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a focus on Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology as well as Computer Science. The scientist's work involves significant contributions to the subfields of Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Genetics, and Information Systems and Management.

Their research topics include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Topic Modeling, Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Natural Language Processing Techniques, Computational Drug Discovery Methods, and Genomics and Rare Diseases.

Hunter has co-authored extensively with several frequent collaborators, including Tiffany J. Callahan, William A. Baumgartner, Michael G. Kahn, Nicole Vasilevsky, and Tellen D. Bennett.

The scientist's publications appear predominantly in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), arXiv (Cornell University), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, and UNC Libraries.

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Lawrence Hunter include:

  • An open source knowledge graph ecosystem for the life sciences, 2024, Scientific Data
  • A Framework for Automated Construction of Heterogeneous Large-Scale Biomedical Knowledge Graphs, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BETA: a comprehensive benchmark for computational drug-target prediction, 2022, Briefings in Bioinformatics
  • Ontologizing health systems data at scale: making translational discovery a reality, 2023, npj Digital Medicine
  • Examining linguistic shifts between preprints and publications, 2022, PLoS Biology

Best Publications

  • EDGAR: Extraction of Drugs, Genes And Relations from the Biomedical Literature

    Thomas C. Rindflesch;Lorraine Tanabe;John N. Weinstein;Lawrence Hunter

  • Overview of BioCreative II gene mention recognition

    Larry Smith;Lorraine K Tanabe;Rie Johnson nee Ando;Cheng-Ju Kuo

  • Biomedical language processing: what's beyond PubMed?

    Lawrence Hunter;K. Bretonnel Cohen

  • Getting started in text mining.

    K Bretonnel Cohen;Lawrence E Hunter

  • MedMiner: an Internet text-mining tool for biomedical information, with application to gene expression profiling.

    L. Tanabe;U. Scherf;L. H. Smith;J. K. Lee

  • Manual curation is not sufficient for annotation of genomic databases

    William A. Baumgartner;K. Bretonnel Cohen;Lynne M. Fox;George Acquaah-Mensah

  • AMIA Board white paper: definition of biomedical informatics and specification of core competencies for graduate education in the discipline

    Casimir A Kulikowski;Edward H Shortliffe;Leanne M Currie;Peter L Elkin

  • Concept annotation in the CRAFT corpus

    Michael Bada;Miriam Eckert;Donald Evans;Kristin Garcia

  • Transcending inductive category formation in learning

    Roger C. Schank;Gregg C. Collins;Lawrence E. Hunter

  • Artificial intelligence and molecular biology

    Lawrence Hunter

  • OpenDMAP: an open source, ontology-driven concept analysis engine, with applications to capturing knowledge regarding protein transport, protein interactions and cell-type-specific gene expression.

    Lawrence Hunter;Zhiyong Lu;James Firby;William A Baumgartner

  • MutationFinder: a high-performance system for extracting point mutation mentions from text

    J. Gregory Caporaso;William A. Baumgartner;David A. Randolph;K. Bretonnel Cohen

  • The structural and content aspects of abstracts versus bodies of full text journal articles are different

    K Bretonnel Cohen;K Bretonnel Cohen;Helen L Johnson;Karin Verspoor;Christophe Roeder

  • The compositional structure of Gene Ontology terms

    P V Ogren;K B Cohen;G K Acquaah-Mensah;J Eberlein

  • Extracting Molecular Binding Relationships from Biomedical Text

    Thomas C. Rindflesch;Jayant V. Rajan;Lawrence Hunter

  • Large-scale biomedical concept recognition: an evaluation of current automatic annotators and their parameters

    Christopher S. Funk;William A. Baumgartner;Benjamin Garcia;Christophe Roeder

  • Natural Language Processing and Systems Biology

    K. Bretonnel Cohen;Lawrence Hunter

  • Mining molecular binding terminology from biomedical text.

    Thomas C. Rindflesch;Lawrence Hunter;Alan R. Aronson

  • A corpus of full-text journal articles is a robust evaluation tool for revealing differences in performance of biomedical natural language processing tools

    Karin Verspoor;Kevin Bretonnel Cohen;Arrick Lanfranchi;Colin Warner

  • GEST: a gene expression search tool based on a novel Bayesian similarity metric.

    Lawrence Hunter;Ronald C. Taylor;Sonia M. Leach;Richard Simon

  • GeneRIF QUALITY ASSURANCE AS SUMMARY REVISION

    Zhiyong Lu;K. Bretonnel Cohen;Lawrence Hunter

  • Biocomputing '97 - Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium

    Russ B. Altman;A. Keith Dunker;Lawrence Hunter;Tiffany A. Murray

Frequent Co-Authors

K. Bretonnel Cohen
K. Bretonnel Cohen University of Colorado Denver
William A. Baumgartner
William A. Baumgartner Johns Hopkins University
Karin Verspoor
Karin Verspoor RMIT University
Russ B. Altman
Russ B. Altman Stanford University
Teri E. Klein
Teri E. Klein Stanford University
Michael R. Bristow
Michael R. Bristow University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Martha Palmer
Martha Palmer University of Colorado Boulder
J. Gregory Caporaso
J. Gregory Caporaso Northern Arizona University
Melissa A. Haendel
Melissa A. Haendel University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Zhiyong Lu
Zhiyong Lu National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens multiple exciting pathways, both in terms of further education and varied career prospects. Many students consider pursuing specialized fields where digital skills are in high demand. For instance, environmental science is increasingly reliant on data and computational tools, and you may want to explore what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree if you’re interested in combining tech with environmental impact.

If you want to fast-track your education, online learning platforms now offer flexible accelerated computer science degree online options. These programs can reduce the time to graduation, enabling you to enter the workforce sooner.

Beyond Computer Science, engineering continues to be a popular choice. Those drawn to environmental applications may benefit from considering an environmental engineering online degree. Likewise, if cost is a concern, you can explore the mechanical engineering cost of education to make an informed choice.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence Hunter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles