World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Common Market Law Review
H-index 3

Common Market Law Review

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Law 74 5 8 2

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 10
Documents by Best Scientists*: 15
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 1
SCIMAGO H-index: 69
SCIMAGO SJR: 1.211
Impact Factor: 2.1

Overview

Top Research Topics at Common Market Law Review?

The journal primarily focuses on research topics in Law, Law and economics, Public administration, Commission and Publishing. Most of the works presented in the journal deals with Law but it intersects with the subject of European Union law. The Law and economics study tackled is a key component of adjacent topics in the area of Competition law.

  • Law (48.18%)
  • Law and economics (13.54%)
  • Public administration (8.53%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • The Making of A Constitution For Europe (186 citations)
  • The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces (160 citations)
  • Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution-Making Revisited? (113 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Common Market Law Review:

The journal papers focus largely on the fields of Law, Law and economics, Public administration, Treaty and European integration. Subsidiarity and European Union law are some topics wherein Law research discussed in the most cited papers has an impact. Aside from discussions in Law and economics, the published articles also deal with the subject of Common law which intersects with Comparative law disciplines.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • Law
  • China
  • Common law

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The main points discussed in Common Market Law Review deals with Law, Economic Justice, Law and economics, Free movement and Politics. Law research presented in Common Market Law Review encompasses a variety of subjects, including European commission and Identity (philosophy). The work on Economic Justice tackled in the journal brings together disciplines like Agriculture and Scope (project management).

It tackles studies in Rule of law and the interrelated subject of Enforcement, Leverage (negotiation), Settlement (litigation) and Veto to gain insights into Law and economics. The journal explores issues in Politics which can be linked to other research areas like Context (language use) and Public administration. The research on Public administration tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Balance (accounting), Parliament, Corporate governance and Public finance.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • A Potential Constitutional Moment for the European Rule of Law: The Importance of Red Lines (5 citations)
  • Between the devil and the deep blue sea : vulnerable EU citizens cast adrift in the UK post-Brexit (2 citations)
  • Equivalence in the area of financial services: an effective instrument to protect EU financial stability in global capital markets? (1 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Common Market Law Review (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Peter Oliver (21 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Roberto Caranta (18 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
  • Jules Stuyck (17 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Vassilis Hatzopoulos (17 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Piet Jan Slot (16 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Common Market Law Review (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Max Planck Society (38 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • University of Luxembourg (22 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • University of Liège (11 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • University of Bristol (10 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
  • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (10 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 87.10% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 75.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 0.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 25.00% of all publications and 0.00% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Top Publications

  • Principles of a systemic deficiencies doctrine: How to protect checks and balances in the Member States

    Armin von Bogdandy

    (2020)
    51 Citations
  • Same-sex spouses: More free movement, but what about marriage? Coman

    (2020)
    4 Citations
  • Privacy vs. shareholder transparency: Did the ECJ decision in <i>WM and Sovim SA </i>impair the global fight against money laundering?

    (2023)
    2 Citations
  • The law requires translation: The Hungarian preliminary reference on preliminary references: IS,

    (2022)
    1 Citations
  • Same-sex spouses: More free movement, but what about marriage? ComanM

    Dimitry Kochenov;Uladzislau Belavusau

    (2020)
    1 Citations
  • Book review: <i>Transnational Narratives and Regulation of GMO Risks</i>. by Giulia Claudia Leonelli (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2021)

    (2024)
    0 Citations
  • The constitutional core of the Union: On the CJEU’s new, principled constitutionalism

    (2024)
    0 Citations
  • Book Review: Personal Debt in Europe: The EU Financial Market and Consumer Insolvency, by Federico Ferretti and Daniela Vandone. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    (2023)
    0 Citations

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal